[ad_1]
Travellers from countries with low coronavirus infection rates could be able to travel to the UK via so-called “air bridges” after an initial blanket quarantine, the transport secretary said on Monday, prompting calls for clarity over the government’s confusing approach to the border.
Grant Shapps told MPs the government should consider allowing travel between the UK and countries with an R-number — a key measure of transmission — below one to try to boost confidence in aviation travel.
His remarks came as it emerged that proposals to enforce quarantine at the UK border, expected to be unveiled this week, would cover sea and land arrivals as well as air.
Get the Latest on Coronavirus and the Travel Industry on Skift’s Liveblog
The UK prime minister, Boris Johnson, in his address to the nation on May 10 announcing the gradual easing of lockdown measures, served notice that quarantine would be imposed on air passengers arriving in the country.
The plans are set to extend to all arrivals into the UK with a number of exemptions, reportedly including hauliers and COVID-19 research scientists.
Ministers have suggested that travellers will be asked to quarantine for 14 days when they enter the UK, either in accommodation of their choice or provided by the government if there are no other options. An implementation date has not yet been announced.
A No 10 spokesman said that once the quarantine was in place, it would be reviewed every three weeks. During transport questions in the Commons on Monday, Shapps said consideration should be given to relaxations for countries with low rates of infection.
Shapps said: “It is the case we should indeed consider further improvements for example things like air bridges enabling people from other areas, other countries, who have themselves achieved lower levels of coronavirus infection to come to the country, so those are active discussions that go beyond what will initially be a blanket situation.”
The scientific rationale for such a move has been called into question, prompting increased calls to publish the advice provided to the government by the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage), the team of advisers informing the response to the crisis.
Lucy Moreton, of the Immigration Services Union, said: “It appears to be all politics and no science.”
The shadow home secretary, Nick Thomas-Symonds, said: “People will want a clear sense of grip and competence from the government’s handling of this crisis, so it is deeply worrying to see such a lack of clarity.
“Ministers need to be open about the evidence their decisions are based on, and give consistent, clear messages on quarantining decisions, both generally and in relation to particular countries.
“This is especially concerning given that the home secretary has still not published the evidence upon which the UK government’s quarantining policy prior to the lockdown being imposed on 23 March was based. This needs to happen urgently, and lessons need to be learned.”
Britain’s aviation and tourism industries warned that the quarantine plan risked worsening the economic impact of COVID-19. Michael O’Leary, the outspoken chief executive of the budget airline Ryanair, on Monday said the proposals were “idiotic and it’s unimplementable”.
This article was written by Jamie Grierson and Kate Proctor from The Guardian and was legally licensed through the NewsCred publisher network. Please direct all licensing questions to legal@newscred.com.
Photo Credit: Travellers will be asked to quarantine for 14 days when they enter the UK, either in accommodation of their choice or provided by the government if there are no other options. Bloomberg
[ad_2]
Source link